Books are not music, but they're close
Publishing people like to say that "books are not music." However, look beyond the art form and you'll see remarkable similarities.
Publishing people like to say that "books are not music." However, look beyond the art form and you'll see remarkable similarities. Supply chain models are the same or so similar the differences are meaningless. Investment models are essentially the same. Royalty models are, again, the same. Commitment to marketing and artist/author development is the same.
Tommy Boy records founder Thomas Silverman said recently in a Wired interview, "80 percent of all records released are just noise, (they’re made by) hobbyists."
He then went on to explain his label’s business model:
Every artist is a business, and has its own corporation under this model, and all of that artist’s creative equity goes into that – not just music, but everything they do. And the investors who are investing and trying to promote on the other side – they own half. So it’s more like a business. An equity partnership.
Notwithstanding that I had conversations with major label CEOs back in 2003 advising that this was the future for their investment strategy book publishers could learn a thing or two from Mr Silverman.
Take it from me, someone who spent more than a decade working in the music industry during its digital evolution, as far as business goes books are exactly like music.
As for Silverman’s comment about hobbyists, he was bemoaning the amount of ‘junk art’ cluttering the commercial music environment. Publishing already has the same problem.